Wednesday 5 August 2015

FIXING CONTINUITY GLITCHES:

QUICK FIXES - 1

Every now and again, I'll deal with smaller continuity issues that don't quite merit a full essay. They can be tackled in a matter of paragraphs so I'll take 3 or 4 of these problems and just merge them all together into one longer piece. 

HEART PROBLEMS

A continuity issue that, amazingly enough, really doesn't get discussed that much. Steven Moffat, however, recently brought a lot of attention to it in Doctor Who Magazine.

The fact of the matter is, the idea of the Doctor having two hearts doesn't really get firmly established until Spearhead From Space. At the begining of his second regeneration, the Doctor is hospitalized and X-rays get taken of his chest. Surprise! Surprise! There's an extra heart, there.

From that point onward, the idea of Time Lord's having two hearts is an established piece of continuity. Bad puns get made on a fairly regular basis (my favorite being: "I'll keep it close to my hearts - both of them!") whenever discussions about Gallifreyan cardio-vascular systems arise. Both sides of the Doctor's chest get checked whenever someone is verifying his pulse. And so on....

Here's the problem: Before Spearhead, there are times when the Doctor's heartbeat is checked. No mention is ever made of the second pulse. The first time we see this is in the very third story of the first season. Ian Chesterton leans his head against the Doctor's chest and comments that everything seems fine. Shouldn't he be shocked that he's hearing mores lub-dubs than he ought to?

Lots of discussions have erupted over the nature of the Doctor's first two incarnations because of this. Many are fueled by such facts as the Second Doctor referring to the process of regeneration as rejuvenation, instead. And the 8th Doctor's claim of being half-human added more gas to the fire. Then there's the mention in Ribos Operation of the Doctor only passing his Time Lord exams on the second attempt. Wild theories claiming that the Doctor wasn't truly a Time Lord in his first two incarnations have been whispered in all sorts of shadowy corners.

I think there's a much simpler answer, though. Ian only heard one heartbeat because he only put his head on one side of the Doctor's chest! If you're not looking for an extra pulse on someone, you probably won't find it. Simple as that, really.

Things do become slightly more complicated when we consider that the Doctor received a full physical during Wheel In Space. No mention is made, then, of the double-pulse. One would expect an actual medical professional to be fairly thorough and would catch such a discrepancy. This can be easily explained. Chances are, a discussion did occur about the matter but it happened off-screen. I'm guessing Humanity, by this stage of development, has run into aliens. So the Doctor very simply explains to the person that is treating him that he's not actually a human. But that we, as an audience, don't witness this discussion. We're too busy following the plot-thread of those nasty bernalium-eating cybermats at the time!

WHERE DID THE NINTH DOCTOR'S "SECRET ADVENTURES" COME FROM?

I love the fact that right in the very first episode of the New Series we immediately run into a continuity error. I'm not actually being sarcastic, here. Doctor Who never cared much about continuity in the Classic Series and I was happy to see, in its new incarnation, it was quickly establishing itself as still being that sort of show.

I'm referring, of course, to the scene in Rose where internet conspiracy theorist Clive provides Rose Tyler with some background on this mysterious Doctor she's researching. It's a very cool and sinister moment but it also doesn't quite gel with what will happen in the rest of Series One.

Clive shows Rose all kinds of pics of the Ninth Doctor throughout the ages. He's at the Kennedy assassination, he's getting a family to avoid a journey on the Titanic and he's visiting Krakatoa just before it erupts (according to Inferno, it's his second trip). Again, it's a really great and mysterious moment. There's just one problem: Rose isn't in any of these pics. And she should be.

There's a little moment earlier in the episode that indicates that the Doctor is fresh from his regeneration at the end of Day of the Doctor. He passes a mirror in Rose's apartment and seems to be reacting to his new face for the first time. So this must be the Doctor at the very beginning of his Ninth Incarnation. The War Doctor, having just had his big adventure with Doctors Ten and Eleven, induces his latest regeneration, and then notices Nestene activity on Earth in 2005. I doubt there's been any time to do much of anything else (a quick change of clothes and an alteration to the console room's desktop theme - and that's about it!).

So Rose is joining the Ninth Doctor only moments after he's regenerated and continues to travel with him until he regenerates again. Basically, she's with him the whole season. So when he watched Kennedy get shot, saved the family from the Titanic and went to Krakatoa - shouldn't Rose be in those pics, too?

Some theorize that Doctor Nine did some travelling on his own before the events of Rose transpire and that's where the pictures come from. I find it hard to believe that he could make multiple journeys in the TARDIS after regenerating and never bother to check in a mirror to see what his new face looks like. On most other occasions, he's checking out a new face within a few minutes of getting it. So this idea doesn't work for me.

Other fans suggest that Rose just didn't happen to be around when the pictures were taken. She was buying some hot dogs down the street when Kennedy got shot. Or was the one holding the camera when the picture of the family that avoided the Titanic was taken. Or the sketch artist didn't like Rose and decided not to include her in the Krakatoa picture. It seems highly unlikely that the only pictures Clive got of the Doctor just happened to be the ones that Rose was coincidentally absent from.

I suggest, instead, that a bunch of travelling occurs for the Doctor between the dematerialisation and rematerialisation of the TARDIS at the end of the episode. When he offers Rose the chance to be his companion and she says "No." and then he comes back a moment later and gets her to change her mind it looks like only seconds have passed. But this is a time machine. It can return to a location in time and space only seconds after it left but can take a huge journey between those two points.

I suggest Doctor Nine spent a considerable amount of time travelling throughout the Universe after being turned down by Rose. Among those journeys, he watched Kennedy get shot, saved a family from boarding the Titanic and made his second visit to Krakatoa. He probably did a bunch of other stuff, too. For all we know, he may have even picked up a few companions for a bit here and there. These journeys could've gone on for several years. But he always remembered Rose and wished she had said yes to his offer. So when the TARDIS finally returns, either by accident or design, to that moment of refusal only a few seconds later -  the Doctor pops back out and makes a second offer to
Rose. She climbs aboard and off they go to experience the rest of Series One.

This idea, to me, makes better sense.   It also enables us to believe that the Ninth Doctor had a longer lifespan than just the year he seems to spend travelling with Rose (was it even a year? It's hard to tell...).

THE MANY FACES OF MORBIUS

The production team tried to have a bit of fun with continuity during Season 14 of the Classic Series. Apparently, they wanted to insinuate that there were incarnations of the Doctor that existed before the William Hartnell version.

One of the nods they make happens right in the first story of the new season. The Doctor re-discovers an alternate console room. Apparently, there's some visual clues that are supposed to get us to believe that incarnations before the Hartnell Doctor had been there. The best we see to support this is a ruffled shirt that looks like Jon Pertwee might not have worn it since it looks a bit pinkish. And a shaving mirror. Was this meant to indicate there was a bearded Doctor at some point? Wouldn't a person who hasn't grown a beard be more likely to having a shaving mirror? After all, they're going to be shaving a whole lot more than a bearded man does (at best, we bearded fellows groom our beard - something we can actually do half-decently without a mirror).

The other big nod to these "hidden incarnations" occurs a few stories later in Brain of Morbius. As the Doctor and Morbius are mind-bending, we see images of previous incarnations appearing within the machinery they're using to battle each other. Pertwee, Throughton and Hartnell all show up. And then, a whole series of other faces start appearing. Oh my God! It's earlier incarnations of the Doctor!

Or it's Morbius' past lives. Which seems more likely. The Doctor quickly regresses back to his first life and does his damnedest to hold on in battle. He fights back with all he's got and starts forcing Morbius back through his earlier bodies. Those are the pictures we see after the Hartnell Doctor appears. They are not earlier incarnations of the Doctor that we never knew about. They're Morbius.

Yes, Morbius cries: "How far back, Doctor? How long have you lived?" (or words to that effect) which tends to indicate that these are the Doctor's lives we're seeing. But it could have just as easilly been a cry of desperation. The Doctor is starting to burn through Morbius' past and the evil renegade Time Lord is really hoping that these three previous incarnations are all the Doctor has. He's yelling out in just a bit of panic rather than questionning just how many lives the Doctor appears to have.
Interestingly enough, I had watched Brain of Morbius before I'd learnt of this amendment the production team was trying to make to continuity so this has always been the way I've interpretted that scene. I was still a relatively new fan at that point but I knew there were only 3 Doctors before Tom Baker. So I just assumed those other faces were meant to be Morbius. So this theory was a sound one for me even before I learnt what the sequence was meant to convey.

I'm perfectly fine with one incarnation of the Doctor remaining "hidden" from us until the 50th anniversary. But the other 8 to 10 that we see in Brain of Morbius are just too big of a stretch.  I know some fans like to refer to the theory of "the Other" that starts to get talked about during the Seventh Doctor era and try to say that these are his incarnations. But that whole concept starts falling to pieces when the New Series comes into play. In New Who, we seem to be back to the idea that Gallifreyans reproduce the way humans do rather than having to rely on Looms. So those mysterious faces have to belong to Morbius. Of course, they also happen to belong to the production team that was working on Doctor Who at the time!



There you go, a few quick continuity glitches fixed. Did you notice how I put the Number One beside the title, though? That means, of course, that this is another ongoing series. We'll see more of these down the road....



12 comments:

  1. You bring up some interesting points. And I agree with them! Maybe that will clean up a lot of the chaos that is out there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with all of these; they are my preferred explanations too. As for the double hearts, either they alternate beats or they beat simultaneously - in both cases you'd only hear one apparent heartbeat.

    As for the Doctor having all sorts of travels in between materializations in "Rose," I imagine him sulking over his rejection and trying to distract himself with travel, but always with a little idea at the back of his head, something he's forgotten that he can't put a finger on - until he slaps his forehead & says "Oh! I forgot to mention time travel!"

    Of course, a more elaborate theory also involves a multi-Doctor adventure with Ten and Rose - after which he goes back to pick her up, having seen that she eventually went away with him after all!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I haven't heard the elaborate multi-Doctor adventure theory. Interesting...

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Charlie Higson Ninth Doctor short story squeezes itself into that last bit of 'Rose' in exactly the way you describe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'd heard there was a book that did that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with your second and third fixes (RTD is on record in a recent issue of DWM (the one with the Fact of Fiction on "Rose", I think) that it's not meant to be a recent regeneration, but I think he's been outvoted by the majority of fandom -- and is there anyone who actually believes in Morbius Doctors, other than as a way to wind other fans up?).

    Your first fix, though... it requires an awful lot of willful ignorance, doesn't it? Fair enough with Ian (who actually only checks by placing his hand on the Doctor's chest), but there's also the matter of Ben announcing in episode three of "The Tenth Planet" that the Doctor's pulse is normal, which it really wouldn't be if he had two hearts. (Compare with Grace's examination of the regenerated Doctor in the TV Movie: "You're still fibrillating badly," she says. "No I'm not," the Doctor replies, moving her stethoscope to show he has two hearts.) And if Gemma Corwyn did in fact learn earlier that the Doctor is an alien, she's awfully sanguine about it. "You and your friend are healthy specimens, aren't you?" she says to the Doctor while examining his chest (and this occurs in part three of "The Wheel in Space", so we can actually see what's happening) -- but if she thought he was an alien, how would she know what constituted healthy for him? There's not a trace of hesitance or uncertainty on her part, though. Do they get lots of Time Lords out by the Wheel?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would assume that, in her first examination of him (which took place offscreen), the Doctor does explain what constitutes "healthy" for his species. So that when she does make that second check later she can make a somewhat confident statement about his condition.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh yeah - and Ben only picks up one heartbeat because, maybe, a heart will shut down when a Time Lord is that close to an old-age regeneration.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yeaaahhhhh.... I remain unconvinced.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Whoops, sorry; only just saw this. Apparently I need to set something up so I'm notified when someone replies to my comment...

    As I noted in my comments above, three separate instances of people examining the Doctor and finding nothing out of the ordinary is starting to strain credibility. (It may actually be four; supposedly someone examines the Doctor in "The Evil of the Daleks", but I couldn't confirm it offhand.) And attempting to produce explanations as to why no one noticed at the time serves more to underline the problem than to solve it.

    One suggestion (from something I read a while back, but I'm not sure now what it was -- possibly John Peel's "The Gallifrey Chronicles"?) is that the second heart is artificially grown and thus doesn't appear until after the first regeneration -- but alas, while this explains Ian and Ben's reactions it still leaves Gemma Corwyn's lack of surprise in "The Wheel in Space" unexplained. Maybe aliens are prevalent at this time (although the more we learn about (roughly) the time period of the Wheel the less likely this seems -- but on the other hand, there's no evidence recently that Salamander's come to power either), but even so, Corwyn would have to be an expert in xenobiology to be as blasé about the Doctor's health as she is. No, it seems the "only Hartnell had one heart" theory doesn't quite work.

    Two other possibilities present themselves. One is that the Doctor doesn't receive his second heart until after his trial. Maybe we could postulate some sort of season 6b reason for this, where he had a second heart installed by the CIA for unknown reasons. Except every Gallifreyan we meet after this seems to be fitted with two hearts as standard. So why would the Doctor have been different? No, it's not terribly convincing, is it?

    The other possibility comes from "About Time". It's a bit more fannish, but it's also more compelling. It does, however, require us to use the novels as a secondary source. (So SPOILER ALERT for anyone who still plans on reading the Eighth Doctor Adventures and doesn't want to know anything about them.)

    After the events of "The Ancestor Cell", Gallifrey is gone, and we eventually learn (in "The Adventuress of Henrietta Street") that a Time Lord's second heart is a connection to Gallifrey, and without Gallifrey around the heart stops working properly. Well, the first two Doctors are on the run and trying not to be found by the Time Lords, so perhaps their second heart has withered or become largely non-functional while they remain firmly away from the Time Lords -- this would mean that their second heart is almost vestigial until such time as the Time Lords reestablish contact with the Doctor, whereafter his second heart becomes active again.

    It's not a perfect explanation, but it does account for everything we see on screen without having to bend over backwards to excuse things.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I've heard the EDA explanation before and it is interesting. We do see the Doctor pointing out a certain part of his brain that has become inactive due to his separation from the Time Lords in Invisible Enemy. That seems to make sense. Not sure why the spare heart would get shut down, though. Any time one of the hearts has stopped in the series, it hasn't been good for the Doctor. But it's an interesting possibility, I suppose.

    Could it just be possible that Gemma Corwyn is able to roll with the punches and can handle having an alien in her hospital who has assured her that his vitals are where they should be? And the dating for Wheel In Space is pretty subjective (We get quite a bit of contradictory information about what year Zoe is actually from). This could be in an era where humanity has met some aliens. They certainly don't seem surprised about Cybermen and Cybermats. I still find a "people weren't just listening to his heart(s) well" as a far more feasible explanation than any of the really complicated stuff that I've heard.

    I can see your point about undermining the problem rather than solving it. But, sometimes, that's the best way to deal with a problem. From my perspective, at least.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for the comment! It will be posted shortly...